The Analytical Method Of Marx And Engels - 1680 Words

Firestone uses the analytical method of Marx and Engels to create a theoretical frame which includes issues of oppression based on sex. I found her distinction between what Marx and Engels specifically say about women and the family model and her theory of a greater understanding of how gender works dialectically and materially very helpful. I also connected with her assertion that issues of gender seem to pervade every part of social life and that â€Å"many women give up in despair†¦Ã¢â‚¬  because of how deep the issues go (Firestone 90). I think this statement is often true because accepting that patriarchy exists in such a multifaceted way can be overwhelming and disheartening. Moreover, I also appreciated the idea that â€Å"[b]efore we can act to change a situation, however, we must know how it has arisen and evolved, and through what institutions it now operates† (Firestone 90). This seems like an important way to bridge the gap between theory and activism. I th ink it is important for activists to consider the assumptions they are working under before they take action. Although I think a lack of action is a legitimate criticism of modern feminism, we still need to know what we are fighting for. I also found Firestone’s point that â€Å"†¦so profound a change cannot be easily fit into traditional categories of thought† to be both profound and indicative of her own assumptions as a theorist (Firestone 91). Just as Marx provided a limited but beautiful piece of theoretical work, so doesShow MoreRelatedDurkheim And Marx s Theory Of Sociology1722 Words   |  7 PagesDuring the industrialization period Marx and then Durkheim began to apply their sociological theories to explain how societies function. Durkheim and Marx approached sociology from very different perspectives. Durkheim argued that the purpose of sociology is to study how the societal norms and social facts affect people on the individual level. He believed that society is â€Å"sui generis† (Durkheim 1912:247), meaning it is a unique thing that exists on its own. However, Marx approached sociology from an economicRead MoreConflict Theory, Karl Marx, and the Communist Manifesto Essay1321 Wo rds   |  6 PagesConflict Theory, Karl Marx, and The Communist Manifesto In order to understand Marx a few terms need to be defined. The first is Bourgeoisie; these are the Capitalists and they are the employers of wage laborers, and the owners of the means of production. The means of production includes the physical instruments of production such as the machines, and tools, as well as the methods of working (skills, division of labor). The Proletariat is the class of wage-laborers, they do not have their ownRead MoreWhat Are the Differences and Similarities Between Marxs and Webers Understandings of Capitalist Society?2939 Words   |  12 PagesEssay: What are the differences and similarities between Marxs and Webers understandings of capitalist society? Introduction Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) are two remarkable founding fathers of Sociology. Both of them spent huge effort to study the rise of capitalist society. Marx created conflict theory paradigm called Marxism while Weber inspired the symbolic interactionism, both paradigm are still influential nowaday. This paper would try to discuss the differences andRead MoreWhat Are the Differences and Similarities Between Marxs and Webers Understandings of Capitalist Society?2948 Words   |  12 PagesEssay: What are the differences and similarities between Marxs and Webers understandings of capitalist society? Introduction Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) are two remarkable founding fathers of Sociology. Both of them spent huge effort to study the rise of capitalist society. Marx created conflict theory paradigm called Marxism while Weber inspired the symbolic interactionism, both paradigm are still influential nowaday. This paper would try to discuss the differences and similaritiesRead MoreFrench Revolution1740 Words   |  7 Pagesher labour. City life in theindustrial society became an altogether a different way of life. These changes moved both conservative and radical thinkers. Theconservatives feared that such conditions would lead to chaos and disorder.The radicals like Engels felt that the factory workers would initiate socialtransformation.Though the judgement of values differed, social thinkers of the time wereagreed upon the epoch-making impact of the Industrial Revolution. Theyalso agreed upon the importance of theRead MoreThe Archaeological Theory Of Practice1451 Words   |  6 Pagesof Culture History are detailed by V. Gordon Childe’s archaeological theory processes. It emphasized that cultural History subdivided historical societies into distinct ethnic and cultural groups by their physical culture, rejecting a comparative method and independent cultural development, with documentation reflecting the development of specific groups have distinctive set of traits unique to each cultural group. It explained change was caused by diffusion and migration in which research with spatialRead MoreCleanth Brookss Essay Irony as a Principle of Structure9125 Words   |  37 Pagespages to the presentation, interpretation and, discussion of the theories of Rosa Luxemburg. On this point I would say, firstly, that Rosa Luxemburg, alone among Marx’s disciples, has made a real advance on his life’s work in both the content and method of his economic doctrines. She alone has found a way to apply them concretely to the present state of social development. Of course, in these pages, in pursuance of the task we have set ourselves, it is the methodological aspect of these questionsRead MoreLiterature Review on Consumer Behaviour16053 Words   |  65 Pagesdegrees to marketer influence (Foxall 1987). Engel, et al. (1986, 5) define consumer behaviour as â€Å"those acts of individuals directly involved in obtaining, using, and disposing of economic goods and services, including the decision processes that precede and determine these actsà ¢â‚¬ . Simple observation provides limited insight into the complex nature of consumer choice and researchers have increasingly sought the more sophisticated concepts and methods of investigation provided by behavioural sciencesRead MoreBranches of Philosophy8343 Words   |  34 Pagesnature of the good life and the importance of understanding and knowledge in order to pursue it; the explication of the concept of justice, and its relation to various political systems[8]. In this period the crucial features of the philosophical method were established: a critical approach to received or established views, and the appeal to reason and argumentation. [pic] [pic] St. Thomas Aquinas [edit] Medieval philosophy (c. A.D. 500–c. 1350) Main article: Medieval philosophy Medieval philosophyRead MoreManaging Out: the Public Sector in the Community Essay2672 Words   |  11 Pagesand |evaluation of evidence or |and relevant literature. | | |critical | |against’ positions. |positions. |Evidence of synthesis | | |analytical ability. | | | |and/or original thought. | | | | | |

Gmo Labeling free essay sample

A largely unknown controversy is taking place between a health conscious public and the food industry. Much of the food the American people eat is altered genetically. Genetically Modified Organisms or (GMO’s) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered by genetic engineering. These organisms include bacteria, yeast, plants, fish and many mammals. There is concern that certain forms of GMO’s could be hazardous to the environment. These genetic modifications also have people worried about the fact that there has not been much research done on the health effects of GMO’s on the human body, and some people feel it is their right to know what they put in their bodies. The problem is that there is no labeling of GMO’s on the majority of foods one would buy at your typical grocery food store that could help them be aware of this possible threat to their health. Typically if a company uses organic ingredients to make their food they take their time to label their product as non-GMO, if someone were to shop at their nearest Walmart, that person would have a difficult time finding a food item labeled as non-GMO. Personal experience has shown this to be true. Going by this information, one could assume that most food items at Walmart or any other grocery store are made with GMO ingredients. Again it is unknown by most that what they are eating is food made with ingredients that is not natural but altered in a lab. A big reason GMO’s exist in the first place is because they are praised as a solution to world hunger and farming costs. Genetically modified wheat for instance has been modified to resist drought, locusts, heat, and other natural occurrences that could destroy crops. The opposite may be true though. A 2003 report by the Soil Association states that genetically modified crops are costing farmers and governments more money than they are making. From the years 1999 to 2003 the estimated cost of GM crops on the US economy was around $12 billion. (Anslow, 2008). Much of the public that are aware of GM foods are highly against food with traces of GMO’s. In 2007 the vast majority of 11,700 responses to a United States government consultation were against contamination of organic food with traces of GM crops. (Anslow, 2008). A debate in 2003 showed that in the United Kingdom half the participants â€Å"never want to see GM crops grown in the United Kingdom under any circumstances† and that 96% thought that society knew too little about the health impacts of genetic modification. GMO’s were brought into the world by a chemical company named Monsanto. Monsanto is known for creating pesticides like DDT, PCBs and Agent Orange. Agent Orange is the chemical that was sprayed over Vietnam in order to kill off a big percentage of foliage, and credited for causing cancer amongst US troops. Why is the US public allowing a company known for creating harmful pesticides to create our food? GMO’s have earned the title of Frankenfoods by those who are aware of the weird science behind the genetic modification of natural food sources. Monsanto has created bovine growth hormones (rBGH) that infects milking cows that puts pus into commercial milk. Louis, 2012). GMO’s are created within the seeds of chosen parent crops in laboratories by splicing genes from completely unrelated species into those seeds. GMO’s have invaded soy, corn, beets, cotton and alfalfa. Monsanto and their GMO’s have proven to be harmful to the environment and the food chain. GMO’s can be created to tolerate herbicides, these herbicides contain glyphosates. Glyphosates can greatly harm grazing animals and pollute the wells and groundwater of the farming areas where they are used (Louis, 2012). These glyphosates that are sprayed on crops have been attributed to the decline of the honey bee, this decline in the honey bee is another danger to the environment and the food chain. The question that obviously has people worried the most is, what are the health risks? There have been very few credible studies on GM food safety. While there are no studies done on the effect of GMO’s on humans, there have been tests done on lab mice and other animals. Animals that are fed nothing but GM food have shown to have a higher infant mortality rate, organ damage and sterility. These results have been mostly ignored since there hasn’t been enough information to link GMO’s and the organ damage in the lab mice. However an article from Natural News states that medical patients that have followed strict non- GMO diets have experienced dramatic health recovery. These patients believe that GMO’s are one of the primary culprits responsible for their persistent conditions, and nutrition experts are starting to discover that this may be true, and a GMO free diet may reduce the need for aid from pharmaceutical drugs. (Ethan A. 2012). An analysis from Vitality Magazine explains how doctors who prescribe their patients with a GMO-free diet are witnessing huge recoveries in their patients. These patients who were told they would have to take pills everyday for the rest of their lives are now experiencing full recovery. (Ethan A. 2012). With the science we have now showing that there may be a link between health issues and GMO foods, why is it so difficult for companies to just label their products with a GMO sticker? The overwhelming majority of people believe that GMO’s should be done away with all together, as it can damage the environment, hurt the natural food chain. The leading company behind GMO’s has been known for essentially poisoning the environment. GMO’s are not a viable solution for world hunger and is not cost efficient for farmers, as it can damage their land. GMO’s need to be labeled to increase public awareness that the food they eat is modified, people can’t be tricked into believing what they eat is natural. So perhaps this labeling will be the first step in doing away with GMO’s all together. Let’s hope there can be an agreement before it’s too late and the world finds how dangerous GMO’s can really be.